Question:
Do you think that game developers are getting lazy on making games for older systems specifically PS2?
D.R.E.
2007-05-10 09:21:26 UTC
Ok im wondering what everybodies opinion on this.Ok I had my PS2 since launch and still play it alot and I recently gotta PS3.Im looking at alot of game reviews for PS2 now and it seems like game developers arent really trying to bring out great games for the PS2 still like Spiderman 3 was terrible on PS2 and even on PS3 actually but even Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam just pretty much went downhill lol but besides Sony cuz they did a terrific job with God Of War 2,the 3rd party developers like Activision and EA seems like there giving up when I think they should actually focus on PS2 more right now at the moment cuz the most system people own and the number keeps growing is PS2 and they would make more developing more great games for the PS2 cuz most people will buy em cuz they ether dont have a PS3,Wii or 360 or that just because theres not really alot of games out worthy enough of payn $60 for right now cuz the only reason I gotta PS3 was for GT5 and GTA 4 basically so let me know?
Three answers:
Czesa E
2007-05-10 09:30:47 UTC
Yes, it's only because they know that they have to work better for the higher priced systems, like soon they will be coming out with a PS4 and the games and consolation will be super expensive so they have to make it worth while for the gamers experience...I'm not saying they are getting overly lazy but they are putting more effort into the more efficient games.
anonymous
2017-01-09 19:31:55 UTC
when you consider which you're having *exciting*, for sure, and that they are not. ^_^ it quite is the issue human beings do not want to confess at the instant....too oftentimes new video games *suck* because of the fact anybody is anticipating *action picture-like* photos and sound, and so no person will pay interest to gameplay. and of direction, Sony especially encourages a number of this by making use of peddling its crappy standard controllers.... yet yeah. ^_^ video games have merely substitute into *too enormous* at the instant. Too many human beings engaged on the failings, and not sufficient *imaginative and prescient* in terms of gameplay. If I *by no skill ever* see yet another first-guy or woman shooter or linear "you ought to love the damned princess" so-pronounced as RPG the place you press *a* button as quickly as each and every 20 minutes between the cutscenes, it will be *way* too quickly. (the irony of it quite is: while i became youthful, i presumed vector and polygonal photos have been the best...they nonetheless are *if there's a interest there*. yet on the fee issues are going, if I *ever* get to truly decide a thank you to make video games, odds are i'm going to easily save on with working with *quantity pixels*. confident, that is chunky, besides the undeniable fact that that is implicitly 3-D chunky) element is....they're jealous when you consider which you have *solid style* in video games and don't bore actual. ^_^ do not sweat it, you're cool. Take care, have exciting.....and enable me understand in case you notice any *working* Intellivisions (and video games) or any rapid-Grafx 16s (and video games). ^_^
Mike Tyson
2007-05-10 09:29:30 UTC
the developers are not getting lazy. just because games arent coming out on the ps2 doesnt mean that they arent making games. they are focusing more on the ps3 and making games for that system now. they are moving forward. in the long run, they will gain nothing if they keep focusing on old equipment.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...